Poser une questionPoser une question
 

TraitéeA problem about Linpack test on WCCS2003

  • lundi 5 mai 2008 15:08songtao_eric Médailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateur
     

    Hello, Everybody, I built a cluster with WCCS2003 , on which I am doing Linpack test. But there is a problem haunted me for a long time. My cluster has 3 nodes,  each node owns 4 Intel Xeon Dual Core processors and 16G RAM. Using the HPL.DAT below, I  did  Linpack tests successfully on every single node. However, after I only modified the Ps*Qs (e.g. 1*24 or 4*6) and assigned this task to 3 nodes,  the computing time was much longer than that on a single node.
    What's more, when I executed "mpipingpong.exe" on 3 nodes, I found that the cpu usage of all nodes kept 100% for several hours but I still did not get the result of pingpong test.  I do not know to solve this problem and wish your help.
    Does anybody meet the problem as mine ?

     

     

    HPLinpack benchmark input file
    Innovative Computing Laboratory, University of Tennessee
    HPL.out      output file name (if any)
    6            device out (6=stdout,7=stderr,file)
    1            # of problems sizes (N)
    10000        Ns
    1            # of NBs
    200          NBs
    0            PMAP process mapping (0=Row-,1=Column-major)
    1            # of process grids (P x Q)
    1             Ps
    4             Qs
    16.0         threshold
    1            # of panel fact
    1            PFACTs (0=left, 1=Crout, 2=Right)
    1            # of recursive stopping criterium
    4            NBMINs (>= 1)
    1            # of panels in recursion
    2            NDIVs
    1            # of recursive panel fact.
    2            RFACTs (0=left, 1=Crout, 2=Right)
    1            # of broadcast
    1            BCASTs (0=1rg,1=1rM,2=2rg,3=2rM,4=Lng,5=LnM)
    1            # of lookahead depth
    0            DEPTHs (>=0)
    2            SWAP (0=bin-exch,1=long,2=mix)
    80          swapping threshold
    0            L1 in (0=transposed,1=no-transposed) form
    0            U  in (0=transposed,1=no-transposed) form
    1            Equilibration (0=no,1=yes)
    8            memory alignment in double (> 0)

Réponses

  • vendredi 22 mai 2009 20:52Don PatteeMSFT, ModérateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateur
     Traitée
    Hopefully your issue has been resolved since it was posted so long ago. If you are still encountering the problem please start a new thread on the forum. We weren't that great at managing our forum in the past, I apologize for that, but we've made serious improvements in handling it and will get to all the new posts now.

Toutes les réponses

  • vendredi 22 mai 2009 20:52Don PatteeMSFT, ModérateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateurMédailles de l'utilisateur
     Traitée
    Hopefully your issue has been resolved since it was posted so long ago. If you are still encountering the problem please start a new thread on the forum. We weren't that great at managing our forum in the past, I apologize for that, but we've made serious improvements in handling it and will get to all the new posts now.