Formula una domandaFormula una domanda
 

Con rispostaHow -- and who wants it?

  • domenica 4 maggio 2008 9.51JAVAA Medaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utente
     
    If we are going to have a safer end-to-end "trust" situation, who is going to decide who is trusted? (Microsoft, The U.S. Gov., Visa, News Corp, or Euro Card?)

    We should filter the internet on the client (AKA your computer), as that way we are all free to filter as we wish, with no risk that others may know or decide. Unregulated communication is also known as free speech. Ban framework, Spam blacklist, and phishing filter are also known as censorship.

    Enjoy!

Risposte

  • lunedì 20 ottobre 2008 0.02motherboardlove Medaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utente
     Con risposta
    Ocker3 said:

    troll??

    spam blacklists are voluntary, you're free to setup your own e-mail server and accept All incoming traffic if you want.


    that is true, but the average user doesn't know how. If communication is going to be monitored, I believe it should be by a Non-profit organization, so money is not involved.
    • Proposto come rispostamotherboardlove lunedì 20 ottobre 2008 0.02
    • Contrassegnato come rispostaJAVAA sabato 14 febbraio 2009 10.48
    •  

Tutte le risposte

  • giovedì 15 maggio 2008 7.21Ocker3 Medaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utente
     
    troll??

    spam blacklists are voluntary, you're free to setup your own e-mail server and accept All incoming traffic if you want.
  • lunedì 20 ottobre 2008 0.02motherboardlove Medaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utente
     Con risposta
    Ocker3 said:

    troll??

    spam blacklists are voluntary, you're free to setup your own e-mail server and accept All incoming traffic if you want.


    that is true, but the average user doesn't know how. If communication is going to be monitored, I believe it should be by a Non-profit organization, so money is not involved.
    • Proposto come rispostamotherboardlove lunedì 20 ottobre 2008 0.02
    • Contrassegnato come rispostaJAVAA sabato 14 febbraio 2009 10.48
    •  
  • mercoledì 8 aprile 2009 20.55John Biccum Medaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utente
     

    We need to empower people to make informed decisions. 

    We don’t need or want a “Big Brother” to make these decisions for us.  But today it is really hard to tell if that mail is really from my bank, if that is really my friend that is IMing me etc.

  • domenica 28 giugno 2009 15.31Pappkartoosh Medaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utenteMedaglie utente
     
    John,

    It is only going to get worse. MPLS layered provisioning keeps the end user form ever finding out. Someone is going to be in COMPLETE control (or the closest thing to it possible). "Someone" may become a moving target... well it is certain to be... the layers involved are at the PlanantLab Vserver war level. virtually, virtual, with virtually no unvirtual risk. ...or for you cyber historians, Ross's TDM slicing mainframes... completely trustworthy! Aboslute nothing can or will go wrong. hmmm, just realised, Turner took the textiles to create silicon valley, and Peroit took the steel industry to create... ?EDS? And EDS... hmmm,everywhere they been is either bankrupt or out-of-business... strange. Now they are HP owned...just wondering when my HPservers are going to need ink?

    Pappkartoosh
    Just another speck in a fibernachi sequence of stars about to be reordered by Andromeda