Oops!
-
vrijdag 15 april 2011 23:13
Alle reacties
-
zaterdag 16 april 2011 0:10
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:13:50 +0000, BullDawg wrote:
So much for journalism. The product is not available outside of the
TechNet/MSDN channel yet but this guy wrote an entire article about release
notes that were obviously not final yet without checking with Microsoft?
Really? That's journalism? I would have taken a look at the date on the doc
and said, wait a minute, perhaps this isn't current, and maybe I should
check with the vendor first.
Apparently sensationalism is more important than fact checking. Say what
you want about the product, but this blog post is nothing more than
garbage.
Paul Adare
MVP - Identity Lifecycle Manager
http://www.identit.ca
On a clear disk you can seek forever. -- Denning -
zaterdag 16 april 2011 1:10
Did you read Sean Daniel's response? You need to expand all to see it.
"RE: Before you install Windows Home Server 2011, RTFM (seriously)
@Ed Bott, it's unfortunate that our beta 1 documentation made it into the RTM content. Right now we're focused on fixing it, then we'll figure out how the process broke down.seandaMS
04/15/2011 01:19 PM"
_______________
BullDawg
In God We Trust
_______________
<Paul Adare [MVP]> wrote in message news:81a36db7-14f1-4bb1-a05d-e894d44afa13@communitybridge.codeplex.com...On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:13:50 +0000, BullDawg wrote:
So much for journalism. The product is not available outside of the
TechNet/MSDN channel yet but this guy wrote an entire article about release
notes that were obviously not final yet without checking with Microsoft?
Really? That's journalism? I would have taken a look at the date on the doc
and said, wait a minute, perhaps this isn't current, and maybe I should
check with the vendor first.
Apparently sensationalism is more important than fact checking. Say what
you want about the product, but this blog post is nothing more than
garbage.
Paul Adare
MVP - Identity Lifecycle Manager
http://www.identit.ca
On a clear disk you can seek forever. -- Denning
BullDawg -
zaterdag 16 april 2011 15:15
So much for journalism. The product is not available outside of the
TechNet/MSDN channel yet but this guy wrote an entire article about release
notes that were obviously not final yet without checking with Microsoft?If it's available on Technet, we DO have a right to expect the documentation to be current and correct!
Nancy Ward -
zaterdag 16 april 2011 16:01
If it's available on Technet, we DO have a right to expect the documentation to be current and correct!
Well, I don't know that we have a "right" to expect that the documentation will be current and correct. However, be that as it may, the documentation as it stands is neither current nor correct.
The quality of this release is not, i think, what we have had in the past.
-
zaterdag 16 april 2011 18:17
If it's available on Technet, we DO have a right to expect the documentation to be current and correct!
Well, I don't know that we have a "right" to expect that the documentation will be current and correct. However, be that as it may, the documentation as it stands is neither current nor correct.
The quality of this release is not, i think, what we have had in the past.
Unless you got Technet free and Microsoft told you that technet is a beta site, then you have a right.
Me, I'm pretty sure that paying for Technet makes me a customer... so yeah, I think I have a right.
-
zaterdag 16 april 2011 23:39
