The winner is...
It wasn't even close.
After reading the round-by-round account of our dual-core desktop CPU
prizefight, it should come as no shock that AMD's Athlon 64 X2 chips
are the runaway victors here, laying out the Intel Pentium D and
Pentium Extreme Edition 840 chips pins up. If we had to call out one
chip, AMD's Athlon 64 X2 4400+ is an outstanding bargain given the
competition, but as our results show, any AMD dual-core CPU will serve
you better than its similarly priced Intel equivalent.
If you're wondering why there's such a striking performance difference
between the two companies' processors, it likely has something to do
with the memory controller. Among the technological differences between
the two, AMD's
memory controller--the
component that sends information back and forth between your system's
CPU and the memory--is an integrated part of the Athlon 64 X2's chip
architecture. Intel's memory controller, however, exists as a separate
piece of silicon on the motherboard. The additional distance between
the CPU and the memory controller adds to the processing lag time and
likely plays a part in Intel's lower scores.
Whatever Intel's strategy, it
doesn't seem to have held up.
We're very interested to see what happens when the next generation of
chips and chipsets hits the market starting in January. But until then,
AMD's Athlon 64 X2 should be your dual-core processor of choice.
Find out more about how we test
desktop systems.
Intel test bed
Asus P5N32-SLI Deluxe motherboard; Nvidia Nforce 4 SLI chipset;
Crucial
1,024MB DDR2 SDRAM 667MHz; 256MB Nvidia GeForce 7800GTX (PCIe); WDC
WD740GD-00FLA2 74GB 10,000rpm SATA; Windows XP Professional SP2;
Antec 550w power supply
AMD test bed
Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe motherboard; Nvidia Nforce 4 SLI chipset;
Crucial
1,024MB DDR SDRAM 400MHz; 256MB Nvidia GeForce 7800GTX (PCIe); WDC
WD740GD-00FLA2 74GB 10,000rpm SATA; Windows XP Professional SP2;
Antec 550w power supply
CNET Labs project leader David Gussman constructed the test beds and performed all testing.
