Thanks for moving.
How come a moderator who has trouble writing clear English can mark answers? The explanation in the thread I linked to above is
>> Hi teylyn.
>> Since poster no continue, I mark the helpful reply as an answer.
>> Sorry for the confuse.
Seeing the poor English, I have a sinking feeling that the mod did not actually understand the post that he marked as the answer. So, since the OP did not respond, any reply to the question was marked as the answer. -- Pardon?
Is that how it works now?
I also see that this very moderator in question posts vague replies and then marks his own replies as answers. See
this example. He has no understanding of the shortcuts in Excel. Yet he posts that the OP must be wrong because he, the mod, does not know these shortcuts. He asks for further clarification and then promptly accepts his post as an answer -- Really?!
This mod definitely needs some more training in the aspects of the product for which he assumes the privilege to mark answers. If he does not have a clucking fue about how Excel works and what the keyboard shortcuts are, how can he assume to answer or mark
answers about Excel, especially his wrongly informed own posts?
This does not paint a good picture for the forums. Clue-less mod with zero subject matter expertise marks his own non-answer as the solution. Is that what you want to have out there on Bing and Google?
Any MSFT who actually knows what is going on, please get back to me with more details about this.
cheers, teylyn
