Answered by:
Reading/Writing To Admin Share (d$) Vs. Network Share

Question
-
For convenience, I'd like to map a drive to the d:\shares\ vs. having to map a drive for EACH share (eg., \\server\photos\, \\server\videos\, etc.). I've read a few threads that say it's bad to map the the physical folder & one should read/write from the share for various reasons. Would someone please confirm/deny that it's okay to write to the actual filesystem w/o going through the Windows Home Server shares?
-BenSunday, October 26, 2008 12:30 PM
Answers
-
on6fourteen said:
For convenience, I'd like to map a drive to the d:\shares\ vs. having to map a drive for EACH share (eg., \\server\photos\, \\server\videos\, etc.). I've read a few threads that say it's bad to map the the physical folder & one should read/write from the share for various reasons. Would someone please confirm/deny that it's okay to write to the actual filesystem w/o going through the Windows Home Server shares?
-Ben
Going through any path other than the UNC path (\\server\share) is unsupported and definitely not recommended. The reason is because of how WHS handles files in the background. Most files are not stored on the D partition.- Edited by kariya21Moderator Sunday, October 26, 2008 12:38 PM more info
- Marked as answer by Lara JonesModerator Monday, October 27, 2008 7:52 PM
Sunday, October 26, 2008 12:36 PMModerator
All replies
-
on6fourteen said:
For convenience, I'd like to map a drive to the d:\shares\ vs. having to map a drive for EACH share (eg., \\server\photos\, \\server\videos\, etc.). I've read a few threads that say it's bad to map the the physical folder & one should read/write from the share for various reasons. Would someone please confirm/deny that it's okay to write to the actual filesystem w/o going through the Windows Home Server shares?
-Ben
Going through any path other than the UNC path (\\server\share) is unsupported and definitely not recommended. The reason is because of how WHS handles files in the background. Most files are not stored on the D partition.- Edited by kariya21Moderator Sunday, October 26, 2008 12:38 PM more info
- Marked as answer by Lara JonesModerator Monday, October 27, 2008 7:52 PM
Sunday, October 26, 2008 12:36 PMModerator -
The reason I like mapping to the d:\shares\ folder is for simplicity. I like having a mapped drive which "points" to all my shares vs. having to have a mapped drive for each share.
Are you writing that, even though it's not recommended, demigrator.exe will eventually get around to doing its thing even if I didn't read/write from the share. I am willing to pay a slight performance/risk penalty for data not being mirrored, etc. for the ability to map a drive to ALL shares.
Monday, October 27, 2008 4:02 PM -
Unsupported means that Microsoft doesn't test the scenario, doesn't take bug reports about the scenario, and doesn't guarantee that it will continue to work, or that it will work exactly as it does in other operating systems. When you pursue an unsupported configuration, you do so at your own risk, and if you have issues, the only answers you receive may well tell you to revert to a supported configuration and your problem will go away.
That said, no there's nothing particularly unsafe about accessing your server's shares through a manually created share. However, I can tell you that you won't be able to manage security on that share through the WHS Console application, and I can't tell you if you'll have other security issues as a result.
I'm not on the WHS team, I just post a lot. :)Monday, October 27, 2008 4:30 PMModerator -
Ken - thanks for the info. I created a new share (not via WHS but rather under Computer Management) called "Global" which maps to d:\shares\. That way I can map a drive to the folder which contains all the shares. I've read a lot about not writing to the d:\ drive b/c it will screw up demigrator.exe & stuff about shadow copies, etc. However, I've been writing to the d:\ directly just fine so I hope all works.
I think the WHS team should include something along the lines of a global share. I imagine many people who upgrade to WHS are replacing some big hard drive (external/internal) which contained all their files (photos, videos, documents, etc.). And they're probably accustomed to clicking on that drive & seeing ALL of their files - not files specific to just photos, videos, etc.
Some apps, like Google's Picassa, cannot accept UNC file paths & insist on a mapped drive when adding a folder to monitor for pictures. Zune, on the other hand, can accommodate UNCs. Either way, for simplicity's sake, I'd love to see a global share down the road.
2 cents.
-Ben
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 3:39 PM -
on6fourteen said:You can store all of your data in one share (Public, for example) and treat that as a "global share", then map a drive letter to that (which is exactly what I would do in your situation if I wanted to map to a single share).
Ken - thanks for the info. I created a new share (not via WHS but rather under Computer Management) called "Global" which maps to d:\shares\. That way I can map a drive to the folder which contains all the shares. I've read a lot about not writing to the d:\ drive b/c it will screw up demigrator.exe & stuff about shadow copies, etc. However, I've been writing to the d:\ directly just fine so I hope all works.
I think the WHS team should include something along the lines of a global share. I imagine many people who upgrade to WHS are replacing some big hard drive (external/internal) which contained all their files (photos, videos, documents, etc.). And they're probably accustomed to clicking on that drive & seeing ALL of their files - not files specific to just photos, videos, etc.
on6fourteen said:You make it seem like it's a shortcoming in WHS. The fact of the matter is all MS OSes work the exact same way in regards to mapping a drive. You cannot map directly to a server. You must map to a share. That's the way it has always been with any MS OS.Some apps, like Google's Picassa, cannot accept UNC file paths & insist on a mapped drive when adding a folder to monitor for pictures. Zune, on the other hand, can accommodate UNCs. Either way, for simplicity's sake, I'd love to see a global share down the road.
2 cents.
-BenTuesday, October 28, 2008 7:26 PMModerator