whitepaper views RRS feed

  • Question

  • what do u think is the quality of whitepapers being posted......do rate it on an average excellent....very good .....good.....poor
    Sunday, March 18, 2007 1:31 PM

All replies

  • reply guys..
    Sunday, March 18, 2007 2:26 PM
  • most of the whitepapers are copied from some site. so they are not always the original ones.

    this means that we are reviewing somebody else's whitepaper, and not the whitepaper of the person who has posted that.

    this means, for all those who have copied and placed them on the site, the quality is poor. but for those who have written themselves, they are ranging from good to excellent.

    Monday, March 19, 2007 11:29 AM
  • Well i think that the papers which are just copied from other places don deserve any rank at all... but if some person has really done some work and collected and compiled really nice data from various sources its worth considering his work... but the person giving his own actual work should be appreciated the most.. but we should also have a control over the whitepapers being uploaded... there are so many whitepapers that we hardly get to see the good ones and ranking is far more away....
    Monday, March 19, 2007 2:41 PM
  • sadly I uploaded 2 whitepapers which I had researched on my own (had presented them in various TPP competitions) but they are lying far behind due to only 6-7 ratings...

    I really think the the whitepapers should be sorted according to newest first or atleast we should be given sorting options..

    Monday, March 19, 2007 4:40 PM
  • same problem here. not many people are reviewing my original whitepapers. Sad
    Monday, March 19, 2007 7:53 PM
  • yes i too agreee
    Saturday, March 31, 2007 5:58 PM
  • comeon guys be active
    Saturday, March 31, 2007 5:59 PM
  • ????????

    Saturday, March 31, 2007 6:00 PM
  • hey
    Saturday, March 31, 2007 6:00 PM
  • the whitepapers are not that great
    Saturday, March 31, 2007 6:01 PM
  • share ur views
    Saturday, March 31, 2007 6:01 PM
  • i thought whitepapers should be ur own theory
    Saturday, March 31, 2007 6:02 PM
  • dont u think??????
    Saturday, March 31, 2007 6:02 PM
  • and also share ur ratings
    Saturday, March 31, 2007 6:03 PM
  • no reply????????
    Saturday, March 31, 2007 6:04 PM
  • based on the content
    Monday, April 2, 2007 12:05 PM
  • yeah its true man.. they are not evaluated properly
    Monday, April 2, 2007 12:22 PM
  • Totally depends whether the paper is original or a copied one. Originals definitely get the better ratings.
    Monday, April 2, 2007 6:41 PM
  • yes ur right frnds The white papers should be original and we r here 2 read them,analyse thema and rate them and give its pros-cons in the comment area.But nothing like that is happening over here SO lets try 2 change this trend.
    Tuesday, April 3, 2007 6:04 AM