Answered by:
How are SFx 2.1 *_tracking tables maintained in Sql Server 2008 (w/o CT)?

Question
-
I was surprised to find that SFx provisioning did not create any triggers in my database ... I thought the _tracking tables were maintained with triggers ...
How are the _tracking tables maintained?
Sunday, June 26, 2011 7:35 PM
Answers
-
Sync Fx should have created triggers (1 each for insert/update/delete) for each table in your scope. if these were not created then somethings wrong with the provisioning.
- Marked as answer by P H T Monday, June 27, 2011 12:59 PM
Monday, June 27, 2011 12:55 AM -
you can specify retention and metadata cleanup via the API, see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee617373(v=SQL.110).aspx
- Marked as answer by P H T Tuesday, June 28, 2011 4:08 PM
Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:38 PM
All replies
-
Sync Fx should have created triggers (1 each for insert/update/delete) for each table in your scope. if these were not created then somethings wrong with the provisioning.
- Marked as answer by P H T Monday, June 27, 2011 12:59 PM
Monday, June 27, 2011 12:55 AM -
Now I see them ...
SQL Server 2008 CT has a setting for how long CT information is retained before it is automatically removed ... how does this happen w/o CT? For example, _tracking table records that track deletes ... how long do they stay in the _tracking table and what triggers them to get deleted?
Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:24 PM -
you can specify retention and metadata cleanup via the API, see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee617373(v=SQL.110).aspx
- Marked as answer by P H T Tuesday, June 28, 2011 4:08 PM
Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:38 PM