locked
SyncFX 3.0? RRS feed

  • Question

  • Is there any word out there yet on the topic of SyncFX 3.0? I'm working on a POC for a pretty long tailed project so any clue on what's to come would be a great.

    Thanks

     

     


    * Note: I have no formal CS education, so take all advice with caution :)
    Friday, March 19, 2010 1:26 PM

Answers

All replies

  • according to this post, its around end 2010... http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/syncdevdiscussions/thread/14d3dbb6-7441-4a26-9907-95e478649436

    if you watch the MIX 2010 session, http://live.visitmix.com/MIX10/Sessions/SVC10, it seems there's v2.1(Azure related) in 1H 2010 and v3.0 wave (Silverlight support, VS tooling, sync protocol) in H2 2010/H1 2011

     

    Friday, March 19, 2010 3:37 PM
  • Thanks, hopefully in a few months more will come out. Will watch the mix session when I get home tonight.

    Thanks


    * Note: I have no formal CS education, so take all advice with caution :)
    Friday, March 19, 2010 3:45 PM
  • the MIX session talks about CTP by invite only in the coming months.
    Friday, March 19, 2010 3:56 PM
  • Were there any features in particular that you are waiting for in V3?

    Thanks, Mark

     

    Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:51 PM
  • Any features in particular that you are hoping to see in V3?

     

    Thanks, Mark

     

    Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:53 PM
  • I would love to see peer-to-peer sync of mobile devices and laptops (CE on mobile, express on laptops).  I would also like offline sync for silverlight.
    Thursday, March 25, 2010 5:44 PM
  • Not really very specific but the stumbling points for me were:

    - Not having an out of the box provider for sql 2008 using change tracking for both offline and collaboration (and a good fix for the problem where if there are records in the table before cc is turned on they are all treated as one version and also there is a similiar problem where if you insert records in a batch then sql cc gives them all one version and thus the batching gets overloaded)

    - Transaction per batch in collaboration

    And a tall order - do away with offline and collaboration and have just one mode where all providers have knowledge optional and the SyncOrchestrator must have at least one provider with knowledge.

     


    * Note: I have no formal CS education, so take all advice with caution :)
    Friday, March 26, 2010 3:03 PM
  • not sure which link you're referring to, but i just checked both links and theyre both fine.
    Monday, September 27, 2010 3:29 PM