locked
Any Issues Experienced With Long Workflow Wait Conditions? RRS feed

  • Question

  • I have a client who is considering implementing 6-month long wait conditions for one of his workflow steps for his On-Premise CRM 4.0 instance. Has anyone had issues with wait conditions this long? I'm curious if anyone has experienced performance or reliability issues where long wait conditions stall out when the async service is overburdened.

    Thanks!

    Phil

     


    Phil Edry – Altriva Solutions – http://www.altriva.com/AltrivaBlog.aspx
    Wednesday, August 18, 2010 7:17 PM

Answers

  • Hi Phil,

    waiting workflow does not consume any memory resources and CPU so you should not face any issue for that

    refer this Post for your reference


    Mahain : http://mahenderpal.wordpress.com
    • Marked as answer by Phil Edry Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:15 AM
    Thursday, August 19, 2010 3:42 AM
    Moderator
  • HI Phil

    Workflow  saves in database

    the async system job only executes those work which execution time is in time frame

    so dont worry

    it will not affect on Performance

     


    Nikkas MIcrosoft Dynamics Crm 4.0 Technology Specialist
    • Proposed as answer by Nika MSD CRM Expert Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:43 AM
    • Marked as answer by Phil Edry Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:15 AM
    Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:43 AM

All replies

  • Hi Phil,

    waiting workflow does not consume any memory resources and CPU so you should not face any issue for that

    refer this Post for your reference


    Mahain : http://mahenderpal.wordpress.com
    • Marked as answer by Phil Edry Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:15 AM
    Thursday, August 19, 2010 3:42 AM
    Moderator
  • HI Phil

    Workflow  saves in database

    the async system job only executes those work which execution time is in time frame

    so dont worry

    it will not affect on Performance

     


    Nikkas MIcrosoft Dynamics Crm 4.0 Technology Specialist
    • Proposed as answer by Nika MSD CRM Expert Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:43 AM
    • Marked as answer by Phil Edry Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:15 AM
    Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:43 AM