Sign in
Microsoft.com
 
Microsoft
 
 
 

locked
Sync Fx 2.1 - Difference between Hub and Peer2Perr Provisioning RRS feed

 > 

  • Question

  • Question
    Sign in to vote
    0
    Sign in to vote

    Hello,

    I have the scenario of one "Server" (which is basically SQL Azure) and multiple clients (sql express) which synchronize with the server

    For doing the provisioning and synchronisation there are many tutorials available, and my sample already works

     

    I'm just wondering if or what is the difference for a hub technology vs the peer2peer in terms of using the SyncFx provisioning and sync.

    Is it "best practice" and faster to make a different scopes for every client?

    thanks

     

    Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:29 AM

All replies

  • Question
    Sign in to vote
    0
    Sign in to vote

    ...to extend my post.

    I know about all the sync knowlege that is beeing kept and so on. So when you have just a sync between a server and multiple client, the knowlege is not as complex as when you sync P2P. I'm  now wondering if this is reflecting somewhere in the provisioning with Sync Fx 2.1.

     

    I already played around with different scopes for different table, based on some sugestions of JuneTs posts.

     

    Is it better or "faster" to do in addition to the table scopes also different scopes for every client? (if you don't need P2P sync between clients)

     

    thanks

     

    Monday, January 2, 2012 10:14 AM
  • Question
    Sign in to vote
    0
    Sign in to vote
    you dont necessarily need to create separate scope for each client if the scope definition or filter definition does not vary between clients.
    Saturday, January 7, 2012 1:41 AM